At the end of June, Who Framed Roger Rabbit celebrated 35 years since its original release, in June 1988. A Disney-via-Touchstone project, it took place in an alternate version of 1940s Hollywood where cartoons were not just alive, but active in the film industryāand practically indestructible, which is why they can get away with so many slapstick stunts. It followed Eddie Valiant, washed-up PI and classic noir antihero (complete with the late great Bob Hoskinsā very questionable attempt at an American accent), whose simple snoop job spirals into the framing of the titular Roger Rabbit (Charles Fleischer) for murder, all as part of a conspiracy of, in his own words, āgreed, sex, and murder.ā
Not your typical Disney flick, is it?
For better or worse, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is probably best remembered for its nightmare fuelāmostly owed to Christopher Lloydās iconic performance as the unhinged Toon in disguise, Judge Doomāand fanserviceāmostly owed to Jessica Rabbit (Kathleen Turner), who, remember, is not badāsheās just drawn that way.
But donāt be fooled: despite its age, there is no denying that this film stands out as not only a marvel of animation but visual and practical effects in general. It won no less than three Academy AwardsāBest Film Editing, Best Sound Effects Editing, and Best Visual Effectsāas well as a Special Achievement Award. As if that wasnāt enough, it was also, simultaneously, a legal achievement, bringing together a wide variety of iconic characters from multiple companies in a way not seen before or sinceāreally, where else will you find Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse sharing a conversation?

(And no, Iām not counting crossovers from properties under the same giant media monopolies. If the paperwork wasnāt exhausting, I donāt count it.)
Roger Rabbit has definitely received spiritual successorsāthis decade alone, weāve had a few different films take on the ācartoons in real lifeā concepts, such as Space Jam II, Tom and Jerry, and Chip nā Dale: Rescue Rangers. Sure, Roger Rabbit didnāt invent this physical language, but itās probably one of the more memorable casesāthereās a reason itās called the āRoger Rabbit Effectā on TV Tropesāand arguably the most successful in terms of legacy and acclaim. Even 35 years later, Roger Rabbit remains unmatched at what it did.
There are a few reasons for thisāone being that weāre in a wildly different world of art and animation technology. You know that kind of uncanny effect on the so-called ā2Dā characters in Chip nā Dale and these other movies? They look like that because they arenāt actually 2D at allātheyāre CGI! Roger Rabbit, meanwhile, was drawn on cells, by hand, the traditional way. What these new movies are emulating, Roger Rabbit actually pulled off. Of course, it just happened to take over 80 thousand illustrations and more than 700 people behind the scenes.
As easy as it would be to turn this into a bashing of CGI and all-new technology, though, the reason Roger Rabbit succeeded goes deeper than that. This movie was, if you may pardon the pun, utterly hare-brained in its execution. At its premiere, it was the most expensive movie produced. Watching Behind the Ears, the filmās own behind-the-scenes documentary gives you a pretty good idea as to why: beyond the painstaking task of hand-drawn animation, this movie was a visual effects spectacle. In the Toon-staffed Ink and Paint Club, for example, the effect of the Toon penguin waiters was achieved by sneaking puppeteers underneath the stage, who moved trays on poles that were animated over in post. The effects department was no slouch with animatronics, either, creating one specifically for Baby Herman to hold his cigar with, and another to spew out water for when Roger emerges from hiding in Eddieās sink.
The wonder of Roger Rabbit is two-fold: stunning practical effects, and the magic of 2D animation on top. (Though really, who could expect anything less with the late great Richard Williams directing the animation department? To Williams, animation was both an art and a craft, in the best way possible)
In fact, this tendency for the fantastic actually resulted in a new creative industry term: ābumping the lamp.ā āBumping the lamp,ā in essence, means going the extra mile in a creative endeavor, even when it makes your job harder. The term originates from a scene where Roger and Eddie are in an enclosed spaceāa Prohibition-era speakeasy, to be specificāwith a single lamp above themāwhich Roger bumps into, causing the lamp to spin around wildly. This shifting lighting then required the animators to keep this in mind as they shaded Roger, giving him all kinds of complex shadows as the light source continued to move.

The creative team didnāt have to do that, but they did. They made something way more complicated, to make it more alive. To elevate it as art.
In short, Roger Rabbit was extraāextra in a way that was risky, and expensive, and exciting, in a way that has yet to be replicated by any of its spiritual successors. If I absolutely had to give this film a contemporary comparison, honestly, itād be Across The Spider-Verse. Spider-Punk requiring multiple years to animate? Thatās modern lamp-bumping if Iāve ever seen it. Thatās a bunch of artists taking a craft theyāre passionate about in thrilling new directions. Thatās beautiful.
And much like Spider-Verseās nods to counterculture, antifascism, and equality, Roger Rabbit has its own revolutionary whispersāthe kind youād probably never expect from a Disney production.
If youāve seen Who Framed Roger Rabbit, youāll remember the looming presence of Judge Doom (Christopher Lloyd), or the iconic twist of his true, terrifying Toon form, a literal living weapon that glares literal daggers. You probably remember him killing Marvin Acme and framing Roger for it, and you definitely remember him killing that innocent Toon shoe. And underneath all that, you might remember that he was plotting to destroy Toontown by dousing it with Dip.
But do you remember why? And how?
Early on in the movie, Eddie Valiant discovers that The Red Carāthe cityās reliable and accessible public transportation, one Eddie regularly (if illegally) usesāhas been purchased by the mysterious Cloverleaf Industries, which proceeded to lay off several Red Car drivers. Eddie actually learns this when he finds one of them drowning in his sorrows, presumably left with no prospects or stability.
āHereās to the pencil pushers,ā Eddie mutters before taking a shot of his own. āMay they all get lead poisoning, huh?ā
Shortly after this, weāre introduced to Toontown, which alongside being a kooky marvel of visual effectsāseriously, some of those greenscreen backgrounds are gorgeousāis more or less where Toons live segregated from humans.
The oppression of Toons in Who Framed Roger Rabbit doesnāt even stop there, and is far from subtle: theyāre very explicitly discriminated against. For example, in the Ink and Paint Club, where Eddie did his snoop job? Very explicitly āhumans only,ā with Toons only allowed in if theyāre servers or entertainers. Toons are also mistreated in their prime workplace, the film industry, which sees Roger verbally berated by his director, Raoul, for being unable to produce āstarsā when struck with a refrigeratorāsomething probably akin to crying on command. Even the word Toon itself is sometimes said in a charged, pejorative air.
When Roger Rabbit tells Eddie, āThereās no justice for Toons anymore,ā you absolutely believe him.
So, Toontown is the home to this obviously marginalized populationāperhaps through intentional ghettoization, for all we know. Whatever the case, the space apparently belongs to Marvin Acme, who allegedly promised to leave Toontown to the Toons themselves upon his passing, claiming he would make such a statement in his will.
Of course, then heās murdered. The titular framing ensues: Roger Rabbit is the prime suspect after Eddie captures intimate photos of his wife and Marvin Acme (that is, intimate by Toon standards. Itās actually a game of Patty-Cake), with the assumption being that Roger killed Acme in a fit of jealousy and rage. Roger and Eddie are forced to work together, hijinks ensueāthey get handcuffed together and everythingāin hopes of clearing Rogerās name and solving the mystery. The whole shebang.
But beyond this unsolved murder, thereās another problem: Acmeās willāthe one that would protect Toontown and its marginalized inhabitants ā is nowhere to be found. This is exactly what Judge DoomāAcmeās killer and the sole stockholder of Cloverleafāhad hoped for. Without Acme, he can safely destroy Toontown.
Judge Doomās goal is horrifyingly simple: he wants to build a freeway. To do this, he aims to dissolve The Red Car (so everybody has to buy cars) and destroy Toontown (where the freeway would go).
āSoon, where Toontown once stood will be a string of gas stations, inexpensive motels, and restaurants that serve rapidly prepared food,ā he declares. āTire salons, automobile dealerships, and wonderful, wonderful billboards reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it’ll be beautiful.ā
Itās all about that bottom line, baby.
And this is where, 35 years later, Who Framed Roger Rabbit remains eerily resonant. Iām watching parallels to this play out in real time.

I live a few cities away from a region deep into its third straight month of a transit strikeāan area where the transit isnāt even owned by anyone here in Canada, but by a foreign company thatās putting profit first. The drivers are simply requesting a living salaryāthey currently make a third of what those in my home city makeāand some other reasonable benefits, but even over three months of no transit for thousands of people havenāt gotten the company to budge.
And you know where else weāre seeing these kinds of struggles? Hollywood and the entertainment industry at large. Look at the Writers Guild of America strike, still ongoing as I type up this article. Look at writers and animators alike expressing concerns about the future of their jobs as execs try to cut corners using A.I. There are industry-wide fears for the future of art and creativity in entertainment, and thatās worrisome. We need to keep making movies that inspire and amaze, not movies that line big studio pockets.
Who Framed Roger Rabbit ends with the violent death of Judge Doom, melted in the very Dip he used to plot his clearing of Toontown, for he himself was a Toon in disguise. Another scene that probably gave kids nightmares, but one that ends in triumphāwith Doom went the threat to Toontown and, hopefully, if it can be saved, to The Red Car. (Thereās probably a whole other thinkpieceās worth of interpretations to the revelation of Judge Doomās true identity, the concept of a marginalized individual taking on the appearance of his oppressors to push forth a regime of harm, putting his own profit and success before the safety of his own community⦠could you consider Doom a traitor to his fellow Toons? I digress.)
Following the death of Doom is a joyous, whimsical musical number, featuring a colorful cast built up of characters from the collective childhood of thousands. Why? Because theyāre celebrating the world Roger Rabbit portrays, both onscreen and beyond itāone where marginalized spaces are protected, one where working-class public servants arenāt wrongfully laid off, and one where making people laugh and bumping the lamp are incredible, powerful things. One where people matter more than profit.

Today, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is treated as little more than a footnote by its parent company. Our titular funny bunny had some stints in the parks and even featured in a TV special celebrating 60 years since the creation of Mickey Mouse, but multiple attempts at a Roger Rabbit sequel fell through. Thereās one where Roger is drafted into the Second World Warāno, I am not making this upāand another that wouldāve followed Rogerās journey to stardom, featuring songs written by none other than Alan Menken. (Tragically, all of Menkenās Roger Rabbit tunes are probably sealed away in the vaultāexcept for this one!) Rogerās gotten some cameos, sure: he showed up in the Chip nā Dale movie, and inexplicably made a cameo in the Pinocchio remake nobody asked for. But at the same time, it seems heās being eased out of the parks, and itās unlikely heāll be getting anything major anytime soon. Honestly, Iām amazed he still has his own ride.
This could be because the movieās got all the makings of some iconic leftist propaganda, but thatās⦠probably not the case. Besides the fact the main characterās literally a cop, Iām pretty sure it flunks the Bechdel test, and Eddieās Toon bullets are literal racial stereotypes. If anything, Disney neglects Roger Rabbit because itās an older property, and doesnāt exactly represent the values theyāre going for in their animated canon today: many of its featuresāEddieās alcoholism, the various innuendos and general violence, and Jessicaās, ah, featuresādonāt exactly mesh with the Disney of 2020s. Heck, the only notable update to Rogerās Car Toon Spin was giving Jessica Rabbit a modesty boost.
Of course, all of this aside, the fact remains: Who Framed Roger Rabbit is a major creative, artistic, and legal achievement, and one with some surprisingly powerful themes. Themes that, unfortunately, are still incredibly relevant today. Give it a watch if youāre looking for incredible visuals, classic cartoons in exciting new contexts, and a rich guy getting melted aliveāwhat else can you ask for right now?